| | | | | | |

Core i5-7400 vs i3-1215U


Description
The i5-7400 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i3-1215U is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7400 gets a score of 173.7 k points while the i3-1215U gets 185.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-1215U is 1.1 times faster than the i5-7400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
906a4
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Alder Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
0.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32/4x64+2x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x1280+2x2048 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
10240 kB
Date
September 2016
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
52.69k points
80.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.7k points
185.6k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-7400
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.72k
15.63k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
19.3k
20.2k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
9.94k (x2.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.73k
8.06k (x0.92)
TOTAL
45.52k
53.83k (x1.18)

Multithread

i5-7400

i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
47.95k
35.72k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
71.98k
56.41k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.22k
25k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.03k
12.48k (x1.55)
TOTAL
145.18k
129.6k (x0.89)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7400
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
22.37k
37.56k (x1.68)
Test#2 (FP)
19.46k
21.13k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.44k
11.35k (x2.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.41k
10.31k (x1.61)
TOTAL
52.69k
80.34k (x1.52)

Multithread

i5-7400

i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
79.57k
73.97k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
71.41k
72.37k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.44k
29.61k (x1.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.27k
9.65k (x1.54)
TOTAL
173.7k
185.6k (x1.07)

Performance/W
i5-7400
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
1224 points/W
4931 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1099 points/W
4825 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
253 points/W
1974 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
96 points/W
643 points/W
TOTAL
2672 points/W
12374 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7400
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
6392 points/GHz
8535 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5561 points/GHz
4802 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1267 points/GHz
2579 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1832 points/GHz
2343 points/GHz
TOTAL
15053 points/GHz
18258 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4