Core i5-7400 vs i9-11900KB
Description
The i5-7400 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i9-11900KB is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7400 gets a score of 173.7 k points while the i9-11900KB gets 537.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900KB is 3.1 times faster than the i5-7400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7400 gets a score of 173.7 k points while the i9-11900KB gets 537.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900KB is 3.1 times faster than the i5-7400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
806d1
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Tiger Lake-H
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
24576 kB
Date
September 2016
July 2021
Mean monothread perf.
52.69k points
63.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.7k points
537.18k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7400
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
22.37k
24.09k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
19.46k
19.54k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.44k
8.48k (x1.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.41k
11.68k (x1.82)
TOTAL
52.69k
63.79k (x1.21)
Multithread
i5-7400
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
79.57k
220.79k (x2.77)
Test#2 (FP)
71.41k
225.98k (x3.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.44k
79.1k (x4.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.27k
11.32k (x1.8)
TOTAL
173.7k
537.18k (x3.09)
Performance/W
i5-7400
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
1224 points/W
3397 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1099 points/W
3477 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
253 points/W
1217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
96 points/W
174 points/W
TOTAL
2672 points/W
8264 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-7400
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
6392 points/GHz
4917 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5561 points/GHz
3988 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1267 points/GHz
1730 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1832 points/GHz
2384 points/GHz
TOTAL
15053 points/GHz
13018 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4