| | | | | | |

Core i5-7400 vs i7-1165G7


Description
The i5-7400 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7400 gets a score of 173.7 k points while the i7-1165G7 gets 210.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1165G7 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-7400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
806c1
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Tiger Lake-UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2016
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
52.69k points
62.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.7k points
210.4k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-7400
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
12.72k
16.27k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
19.3k
25.74k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
11.5k (x2.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.73k
10.82k (x1.24)
TOTAL
45.52k
64.32k (x1.41)

Multithread

i5-7400

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
47.95k
54k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
71.98k
88.76k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.22k
35.23k (x2.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.03k
12.14k (x1.51)
TOTAL
145.18k
190.12k (x1.31)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7400
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
22.37k
22.97k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
19.46k
21.61k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.44k
8.99k (x2.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.41k
8.52k (x1.33)
TOTAL
52.69k
62.1k (x1.18)

Multithread

i5-7400

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
79.57k
82.75k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
71.41k
86.58k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.44k
29.34k (x1.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.27k
11.72k (x1.87)
TOTAL
173.7k
210.4k (x1.21)

Performance/W
i5-7400
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
1224 points/W
2955 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1099 points/W
3092 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
253 points/W
1048 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
96 points/W
419 points/W
TOTAL
2672 points/W
7514 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7400
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6392 points/GHz
4887 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5561 points/GHz
4599 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1267 points/GHz
1912 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1832 points/GHz
1813 points/GHz
TOTAL
15053 points/GHz
13212 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4