| | | | | | |

Core i5-7300U vs i7-950


Description
The i5-7300U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i7-950 is based on Westmere.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300U gets a score of 82.9 k points while the i7-950 gets 76.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-7300U is 1.1 times faster than the i7-950 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
106a5
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Bloomfield
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.066 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.333 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2017
June 2009
Mean monothread perf.
48.25k points
19.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
109.1k points
76.29k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-7300U
i7-950
Test#1 (Integers)
9.96k
8.01k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
15.11k
5.38k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.87k
3.11k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.54k
2.96k (x0.65)
TOTAL
33.47k
19.46k (x0.58)

Multithread

i5-7300U

i7-950
Test#1 (Integers)
25.26k
31.53k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
40.6k
24.16k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.24k
15.84k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.83k
4.75k (x0.81)
TOTAL
82.94k
76.29k (x0.92)

Performance/W
i5-7300U
i7-950
Test#1 (Integers)
1684 points/W
243 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2707 points/W
186 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
750 points/W
122 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
389 points/W
37 points/W
TOTAL
5530 points/W
587 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7300U
i7-950
Test#1 (Integers)
2845 points/GHz
2403 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4316 points/GHz
1614 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1105 points/GHz
934 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1296 points/GHz
888 points/GHz
TOTAL
9563 points/GHz
5839 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4