Core i5-7300U vs Celeron N5105
Description
The i5-7300U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the N5105 is based on Tremont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300U gets a score of 82.9 k points while the N5105 gets 64.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7300U is 1.3 times faster than the N5105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300U gets a score of 82.9 k points while the N5105 gets 64.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7300U is 1.3 times faster than the N5105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
906c0
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Jasper Lake
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA 1338
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
1536 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2017
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
48.25k points
27.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
109.1k points
64.09k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-7300U
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
9.96k
9.83k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
15.11k
9.74k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.87k
3.65k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.54k
3.88k (x0.86)
TOTAL
33.47k
27.1k (x0.81)
Multithread
i5-7300U
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
25.26k
25.04k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
40.6k
24.7k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.24k
9.29k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.83k
5.06k (x0.87)
TOTAL
82.94k
64.09k (x0.77)
Performance/W
i5-7300U
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
1684 points/W
2504 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2707 points/W
2470 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
750 points/W
929 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
389 points/W
506 points/W
TOTAL
5530 points/W
6409 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-7300U
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
2845 points/GHz
3388 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4316 points/GHz
3358 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1105 points/GHz
1259 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1296 points/GHz
1338 points/GHz
TOTAL
9563 points/GHz
9344 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4