Core i5-7300U vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
Description
The i5-7300U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 5900HS is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300U gets a score of 109.1 k points while the 5900HS gets 435 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HS is 4 times faster than the i5-7300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300U gets a score of 109.1 k points while the 5900HS gets 435 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900HS is 4 times faster than the i5-7300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
a50f00
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Cezanne
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2017
December 2021
Mean monothread perf.
48.25k points
81.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
109.1k points
434.96k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7300U
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
20.18k
21.2k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
18.57k
25k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.24k
11.44k (x2.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.25k
24.22k (x4.61)
TOTAL
48.25k
81.87k (x1.7)
Multithread
i5-7300U
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
47.75k
145.13k (x3.04)
Test#2 (FP)
44.82k
198.36k (x4.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.82k
85.67k (x7.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.7k
5.79k (x1.02)
TOTAL
109.1k
434.96k (x3.99)
Performance/W
i5-7300U
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
3184 points/W
4147 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2988 points/W
5667 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
721 points/W
2448 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
380 points/W
166 points/W
TOTAL
7273 points/W
12427 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-7300U
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
5766 points/GHz
4608 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5306 points/GHz
5436 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1213 points/GHz
2488 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1501 points/GHz
5266 points/GHz
TOTAL
13785 points/GHz
17797 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4