Core i5-7300HQ vs Xeon W3520
Description
The i5-7300HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the W3520 is based on Nehalem.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300HQ gets a score of 130.4 k points while the W3520 gets 73.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7300HQ is 1.8 times faster than the W3520 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300HQ gets a score of 130.4 k points while the W3520 gets 73.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7300HQ is 1.8 times faster than the W3520 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
106a5
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Nehalem-WS
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.667 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.933 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/4
4 /8
TDP
45 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2017
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
53.51k points
17.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.81k points
73.16k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
11.71k
7.35k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
16.74k
4.89k (x0.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.27k
2.9k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.81k
2.82k (x0.36)
TOTAL
40.53k
17.96k (x0.44)
Multithread
i5-7300HQ
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
44.38k
29.69k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
62.55k
22.26k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.6k
14.91k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.85k
6.29k (x0.8)
TOTAL
130.38k
73.16k (x0.56)
Performance/W
i5-7300HQ
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
986 points/W
228 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1390 points/W
171 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
347 points/W
115 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
174 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
2897 points/W
563 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-7300HQ
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
3347 points/GHz
2506 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4783 points/GHz
1669 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1221 points/GHz
989 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2231 points/GHz
960 points/GHz
TOTAL
11581 points/GHz
6123 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4