| | | | | | |

Core i5-7300HQ vs Xeon E5-2670 v3


Description
The i5-7300HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300HQ gets a score of 168.8 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 452.9 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 2.7 times faster than the i5-7300HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
306f2
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Haswell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/4
12/24
TDP
45 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
30720 kB
Date
January 2017
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
53.51k points
36.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.81k points
452.9k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3.41k
3.52k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
14.14k
8.68k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.41k
2.83k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.87k
3.13k (x0.35)
TOTAL
30.83k
18.17k (x0.59)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
12.75k
32.7k (x2.57)
Test#2 (FP)
52.88k
105.18k (x1.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.25k
35.18k (x2.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.98k
9.54k (x1.06)
TOTAL
90.85k
182.59k (x2.01)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
11.71k
11.08k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
16.74k
9.57k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.27k
3.18k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.81k
3.28k (x0.42)
TOTAL
40.53k
27.11k (x0.67)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
44.38k
139.07k (x3.13)
Test#2 (FP)
62.55k
133.47k (x2.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.6k
46.6k (x2.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.85k
6.65k (x0.85)
TOTAL
130.38k
325.78k (x2.5)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
11.59k
11.18k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
17.89k
10.06k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.14k
3.21k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.88k
3.12k (x0.4)
TOTAL
41.5k
27.57k (x0.66)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
44.42k
140.98k (x3.17)
Test#2 (FP)
67.5k
145.37k (x2.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.6k
45.62k (x3.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.06k
6.75k (x0.84)
TOTAL
134.58k
338.73k (x2.52)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
21.65k
18.62k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
19.18k
10.49k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.38k
4.04k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.3k
3.26k (x0.39)
TOTAL
53.51k
36.41k (x0.68)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
77.12k
236.25k (x3.06)
Test#2 (FP)
68.68k
151.05k (x2.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.24k
58.9k (x3.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.78k
6.7k (x0.86)
TOTAL
168.81k
452.9k (x2.68)

Performance/W
i5-7300HQ
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
1714 points/W
1969 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1526 points/W
1259 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
339 points/W
491 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
3751 points/W
3774 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7300HQ
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
6186 points/GHz
6006 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5480 points/GHz
3385 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
1303 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2372 points/GHz
1052 points/GHz
TOTAL
15289 points/GHz
11745 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4