Core i5-7300HQ vs N100
Description
The i5-7300HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300HQ gets a score of 168.8 k points while the gets 88.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7300HQ is 1.9 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300HQ gets a score of 168.8 k points while the gets 88.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7300HQ is 1.9 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
b06e0
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Alder Lake-N
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
0.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
BGA 1264
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
45 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2017
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
53.51k points
36.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.81k points
88.29k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
21.65k
15.23k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
19.18k
11.04k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.38k
5.54k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.3k
4.98k (x0.6)
TOTAL
53.51k
36.79k (x0.69)
Multithread
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
77.12k
37.07k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
68.68k
32.57k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.24k
14.75k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.78k
3.9k (x0.5)
TOTAL
168.81k
88.29k (x0.52)
Performance/W
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
1714 points/W
6178 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1526 points/W
5429 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
339 points/W
2459 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
649 points/W
TOTAL
3751 points/W
14715 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
6186 points/GHz
4479 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5480 points/GHz
3247 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
1631 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2372 points/GHz
1464 points/GHz
TOTAL
15289 points/GHz
10821 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4