| | | | | | |

Core i5-7300HQ vs i7-9700F


Description
The i5-7300HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i7-9700F is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300HQ gets a score of 130.4 k points while the i7-9700F gets 269.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-9700F is 2.1 times faster than the i5-7300HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
906ed
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/8
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2017
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
53.51k points
60.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.81k points
269.85k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
3.41k
4.67k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
14.14k
17.16k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.41k
5.7k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.87k
14.37k (x1.62)
TOTAL
30.83k
41.9k (x1.36)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
12.75k
26.31k (x2.06)
Test#2 (FP)
52.88k
97.53k (x1.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.25k
31.53k (x1.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.98k
8.94k (x1)
TOTAL
90.85k
164.31k (x1.81)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
11.71k
16.8k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
16.74k
24.08k (x1.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.27k
6.06k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.81k
13.98k (x1.79)
TOTAL
40.53k
60.93k (x1.5)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
44.38k
92.79k (x2.09)
Test#2 (FP)
62.55k
135.13k (x2.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.6k
33.29k (x2.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.85k
8.64k (x1.1)
TOTAL
130.38k
269.85k (x2.07)

Performance/W
i5-7300HQ
i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
986 points/W
1428 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1390 points/W
2079 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
347 points/W
512 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
174 points/W
133 points/W
TOTAL
2897 points/W
4152 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7300HQ
i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
3347 points/GHz
3575 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4783 points/GHz
5124 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1221 points/GHz
1290 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2231 points/GHz
2975 points/GHz
TOTAL
11581 points/GHz
12964 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4