| | | | | | |

Core i5-7300HQ vs i5-5675R


Description
The i5-7300HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-5675R is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300HQ gets a score of 168.8 k points while the i5-5675R gets 194.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-5675R is 1.2 times faster than the i5-7300HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
40671
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Bradwell-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
BGA1364
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2017
June 2015
Mean monothread perf.
53.51k points
51.43k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.81k points
194.2k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
3.41k
4.14k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
14.14k
14.35k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.41k
4.94k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.87k
5.47k (x0.62)
TOTAL
30.83k
28.91k (x0.94)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
12.75k
16.02k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
52.88k
54.6k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.25k
18.69k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.98k
16.87k (x1.88)
TOTAL
90.85k
106.18k (x1.17)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
11.71k
12.86k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
16.74k
16.85k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.27k
5.19k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.81k
5.49k (x0.7)
TOTAL
40.53k
40.39k (x1)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
44.38k
50.07k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
62.55k
64.61k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.6k
19.84k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.85k
17.09k (x2.18)
TOTAL
130.38k
151.6k (x1.16)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
11.59k
12.88k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
17.89k
18.27k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.14k
5.12k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.88k
5.45k (x0.69)
TOTAL
41.5k
41.72k (x1.01)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
44.42k
49.91k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
67.5k
70.3k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.6k
19.69k (x1.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.06k
16.92k (x2.1)
TOTAL
134.58k
156.83k (x1.17)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
21.65k
21.91k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
19.18k
18.59k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.38k
5.2k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.3k
5.72k (x0.69)
TOTAL
53.51k
51.43k (x0.96)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
77.12k
84.92k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
68.68k
72.09k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.24k
20.13k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.78k
17.07k (x2.19)
TOTAL
168.81k
194.2k (x1.15)

Performance/W
i5-7300HQ
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
1714 points/W
1306 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1526 points/W
1109 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
339 points/W
310 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
263 points/W
TOTAL
3751 points/W
2988 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7300HQ
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
6186 points/GHz
6087 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5480 points/GHz
5164 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
1445 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2372 points/GHz
1590 points/GHz
TOTAL
15289 points/GHz
14286 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4