| | | | | | |

Core i5-7300HQ vs i5-10500


Description
The i5-7300HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-10500 is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300HQ gets a score of 168.8 k points while the i5-10500 gets 388 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10500 is 2.3 times faster than the i5-7300HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
a0653
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2017
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
53.51k points
75.27k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.81k points
387.99k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
3.41k
4.52k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
14.14k
18.52k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.41k
5.58k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.87k
14.2k (x1.6)
TOTAL
30.83k
42.82k (x1.39)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
12.75k
25.26k (x1.98)
Test#2 (FP)
52.88k
120.48k (x2.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.25k
38.12k (x2.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.98k
7.68k (x0.86)
TOTAL
90.85k
191.54k (x2.11)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
11.71k
16.3k (x1.39)
Test#2 (FP)
16.74k
23.22k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.27k
6.22k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.81k
14.05k (x1.8)
TOTAL
40.53k
59.79k (x1.48)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
44.38k
92.61k (x2.09)
Test#2 (FP)
62.55k
147.68k (x2.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.6k
40.71k (x2.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.85k
7.78k (x0.99)
TOTAL
130.38k
288.77k (x2.21)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
11.59k
16.33k (x1.41)
Test#2 (FP)
17.89k
24.73k (x1.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.14k
5.99k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.88k
13.64k (x1.73)
TOTAL
41.5k
60.69k (x1.46)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
44.42k
91.64k (x2.06)
Test#2 (FP)
67.5k
158.71k (x2.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.6k
39.84k (x2.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.06k
7.76k (x0.96)
TOTAL
134.58k
297.94k (x2.21)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
21.65k
28.73k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
19.18k
26.01k (x1.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.38k
6.08k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.3k
14.46k (x1.74)
TOTAL
53.51k
75.27k (x1.41)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
77.12k
172.66k (x2.24)
Test#2 (FP)
68.68k
167.57k (x2.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.24k
39.45k (x2.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.78k
8.31k (x1.07)
TOTAL
168.81k
387.99k (x2.3)

Performance/W
i5-7300HQ
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
1714 points/W
2656 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1526 points/W
2578 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
339 points/W
607 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
128 points/W
TOTAL
3751 points/W
5969 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7300HQ
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
6186 points/GHz
6384 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5480 points/GHz
5780 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
1351 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2372 points/GHz
3212 points/GHz
TOTAL
15289 points/GHz
16727 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4