| | | | | | |

Core i5-7300HQ vs i5-10400T


Description
The i5-7300HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300HQ gets a score of 168.8 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.8 times faster than the i5-7300HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
a0653
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
45 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2017
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
53.51k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.81k points
307.18k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.41k
4k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
14.14k
14.19k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.41k
4.62k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.87k
11.03k (x1.24)
TOTAL
30.83k
33.84k (x1.1)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
12.75k
22.77k (x1.79)
Test#2 (FP)
52.88k
96.59k (x1.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.25k
31.65k (x1.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.98k
2.45k (x0.27)
TOTAL
90.85k
153.46k (x1.69)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
11.71k
12.61k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
16.74k
17.94k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.27k
4.83k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.81k
10.81k (x1.38)
TOTAL
40.53k
46.19k (x1.14)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
44.38k
74.62k (x1.68)
Test#2 (FP)
62.55k
119.63k (x1.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.6k
32.65k (x2.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.85k
2.52k (x0.32)
TOTAL
130.38k
229.42k (x1.76)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
11.59k
12.5k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
17.89k
19.05k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.14k
4.72k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.88k
10.3k (x1.31)
TOTAL
41.5k
46.57k (x1.12)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
44.42k
74.58k (x1.68)
Test#2 (FP)
67.5k
126.96k (x1.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.6k
31.76k (x2.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.06k
2.5k (x0.31)
TOTAL
134.58k
235.8k (x1.75)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
21.65k
22k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
19.18k
19.98k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.38k
4.57k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.3k
11.31k (x1.36)
TOTAL
53.51k
57.85k (x1.08)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
77.12k
136.69k (x1.77)
Test#2 (FP)
68.68k
135.25k (x1.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.24k
32.76k (x2.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.78k
2.48k (x0.32)
TOTAL
168.81k
307.18k (x1.82)

Performance/W
i5-7300HQ
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
1714 points/W
3905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1526 points/W
3864 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
339 points/W
936 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
3751 points/W
8776 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7300HQ
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
6186 points/GHz
6111 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5480 points/GHz
5549 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
1268 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2372 points/GHz
3141 points/GHz
TOTAL
15289 points/GHz
16069 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4