| | | | | | |

Core i5-7300HQ vs i3-8130U


Description
Both models i5-7300HQ and i3-8130U are based on Kaby Lake architecture.

The first Kaby Lake CPU was released in August 2016. It uses a 14 nm process and was the first architecture in breaking the previous tick-tock model. Actually, it is not that different from the preceding Skylake: it has 64kB of L1 cache and 256kB L2 cache per core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300HQ gets a score of 168.8 k points while the i3-8130U gets 88.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-7300HQ is 1.9 times faster than the i3-8130U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
806ea
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Kaby Lake-R
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2017
February 2018
Mean monothread perf.
53.51k points
47.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.81k points
88.35k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
21.65k
21.09k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
19.18k
19.41k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.38k
4.05k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.3k
2.8k (x0.34)
TOTAL
53.51k
47.35k (x0.88)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
77.12k
38.23k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
68.68k
38.89k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.24k
8.75k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.78k
2.47k (x0.32)
TOTAL
168.81k
88.35k (x0.52)

Performance/W
i5-7300HQ
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
1714 points/W
2549 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1526 points/W
2593 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
339 points/W
584 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
165 points/W
TOTAL
3751 points/W
5890 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7300HQ
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
6186 points/GHz
6204 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5480 points/GHz
5708 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
1190 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2372 points/GHz
823 points/GHz
TOTAL
15289 points/GHz
13925 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4