Core i5-7300HQ vs Ryzen 3 1200
Description
The i5-7300HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 1200 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300HQ gets a score of 168.8 k points while the 1200 gets 117.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7300HQ is 1.4 times faster than the 1200. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300HQ gets a score of 168.8 k points while the 1200 gets 117.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7300HQ is 1.4 times faster than the 1200. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
800f11
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2017
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
53.51k points
37.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.81k points
117.81k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
21.65k
11.73k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
19.18k
18.85k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.38k
4.22k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.3k
2.76k (x0.33)
TOTAL
53.51k
37.55k (x0.7)
Multithread
i5-7300HQ
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
77.12k
38.56k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
68.68k
62.21k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.24k
13.7k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.78k
3.33k (x0.43)
TOTAL
168.81k
117.81k (x0.7)
Performance/W
i5-7300HQ
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
1714 points/W
593 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1526 points/W
957 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
339 points/W
211 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
51 points/W
TOTAL
3751 points/W
1812 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-7300HQ
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
6186 points/GHz
3449 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5480 points/GHz
5544 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
1242 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2372 points/GHz
810 points/GHz
TOTAL
15289 points/GHz
11045 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4