| | | | | | |

Core i5-7300HQ vs i3-1215U


Description
The i5-7300HQ is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i3-1215U is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7300HQ gets a score of 168.8 k points while the i3-1215U gets 185.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-1215U is 1.1 times faster than the i5-7300HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
906a4
Core
Kaby Lake-H
Alder Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
0.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/8
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32/4x64+2x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x1280+2x2048 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
10240 kB
Date
January 2017
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
53.51k points
80.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.81k points
185.6k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.41k
6.95k (x2.04)
Test#2 (FP)
14.14k
16.28k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.41k
10.49k (x2.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.87k
9.95k (x1.12)
TOTAL
30.83k
43.67k (x1.42)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.75k
14.97k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
52.88k
51.01k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.25k
30.47k (x1.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.98k
8.59k (x0.96)
TOTAL
90.85k
105.05k (x1.16)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.71k
20.87k (x1.78)
Test#2 (FP)
16.74k
20.74k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.27k
11.32k (x2.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.81k
8.32k (x1.07)
TOTAL
40.53k
61.26k (x1.51)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
44.38k
45.12k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
62.55k
60.59k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.6k
28.48k (x1.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.85k
14.06k (x1.79)
TOTAL
130.38k
148.26k (x1.14)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.59k
15.63k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
17.89k
20.2k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.14k
9.94k (x2.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.88k
8.06k (x1.02)
TOTAL
41.5k
53.83k (x1.3)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
44.42k
35.72k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
67.5k
56.41k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.6k
25k (x1.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.06k
12.48k (x1.55)
TOTAL
134.58k
129.6k (x0.96)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7300HQ
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
21.65k
37.56k (x1.73)
Test#2 (FP)
19.18k
21.13k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.38k
11.35k (x2.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.3k
10.31k (x1.24)
TOTAL
53.51k
80.34k (x1.5)

Multithread

i5-7300HQ

i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
77.12k
73.97k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
68.68k
72.37k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.24k
29.61k (x1.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.78k
9.65k (x1.24)
TOTAL
168.81k
185.6k (x1.1)

Performance/W
i5-7300HQ
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
1714 points/W
4931 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1526 points/W
4825 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
339 points/W
1974 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
643 points/W
TOTAL
3751 points/W
12374 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7300HQ
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
6186 points/GHz
8535 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5480 points/GHz
4802 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
2579 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2372 points/GHz
2343 points/GHz
TOTAL
15289 points/GHz
18258 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4