Core i5-7200U vs Celeron N5100
Description
The i5-7200U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the N5100 is based on Tremont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7200U gets a score of 75.9 k points while the N5100 gets 89.8 k points.
Summarizing, the N5100 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-7200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7200U gets a score of 75.9 k points while the N5100 gets 89.8 k points.
Summarizing, the N5100 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-7200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
906c0
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Jasper Lake
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA 1338
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
1536 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2016
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
44.94k points
26.98k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.52k points
89.82k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-7200U
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
11.39k
9.74k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
16.47k
9.84k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.36k
3.89k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.21k
3.51k (x0.67)
TOTAL
37.43k
26.98k (x0.72)
Multithread
i5-7200U
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
23.57k
34.19k (x1.45)
Test#2 (FP)
37.4k
36.28k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.15k
15.3k (x1.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.78k
4.05k (x0.85)
TOTAL
75.9k
89.82k (x1.18)
Performance/W
i5-7200U
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
1572 points/W
5699 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2493 points/W
6047 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
677 points/W
2550 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
319 points/W
674 points/W
TOTAL
5060 points/W
14970 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-7200U
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
3674 points/GHz
3479 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5313 points/GHz
3514 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1406 points/GHz
1389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1680 points/GHz
1255 points/GHz
TOTAL
12073 points/GHz
9637 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4