| | | | | | |

Core i5-7200U vs Ryzen 5 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition


Description
The i5-7200U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7200U gets a score of 97.5 k points while the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition gets 174.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition is 1.8 times faster than the i5-7200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
810f81
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2016
October 2019
Mean monothread perf.
44.94k points
45.3k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.52k points
174.19k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7200U
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
19.34k
13.77k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
17.47k
22.62k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.08k
4.91k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.04k
4k (x0.99)
TOTAL
44.94k
45.3k (x1.01)

Multithread

i5-7200U

3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
42.86k
50.44k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
41.3k
94k (x2.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.69k
25.64k (x2.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.68k
4.11k (x1.12)
TOTAL
97.52k
174.19k (x1.79)

Performance/W
i5-7200U
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
2857 points/W
3363 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2753 points/W
6267 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
646 points/W
1710 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
245 points/W
274 points/W
TOTAL
6501 points/W
11613 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7200U
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
6239 points/GHz
3722 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5637 points/GHz
6113 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1316 points/GHz
1326 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1304 points/GHz
1082 points/GHz
TOTAL
14496 points/GHz
12243 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4