Core i5-7200U vs Ryzen 5 5600H
Description
The i5-7200U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 5600H is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7200U gets a score of 97.5 k points while the 5600H gets 255.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600H is 2.6 times faster than the i5-7200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7200U gets a score of 97.5 k points while the 5600H gets 255.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600H is 2.6 times faster than the i5-7200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
a50f00
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Cezanne
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
16384 kB
Date
August 2016
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
44.94k points
53.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.52k points
255.19k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7200U
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
19.34k
14.34k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
17.47k
17.67k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.08k
6.41k (x1.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.04k
14.95k (x3.7)
TOTAL
44.94k
53.37k (x1.19)
Multithread
i5-7200U
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
42.86k
83.58k (x1.95)
Test#2 (FP)
41.3k
119.22k (x2.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.69k
48.56k (x5.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.68k
3.83k (x1.04)
TOTAL
97.52k
255.19k (x2.62)
Performance/W
i5-7200U
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
2857 points/W
1857 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2753 points/W
2649 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
646 points/W
1079 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
245 points/W
85 points/W
TOTAL
6501 points/W
5671 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-7200U
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
6239 points/GHz
3413 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5637 points/GHz
4207 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1316 points/GHz
1527 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1304 points/GHz
3560 points/GHz
TOTAL
14496 points/GHz
12707 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4