Core i5-7200U vs i7-11700F
Description
The i5-7200U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i7-11700F is based on Rocket Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7200U gets a score of 97.5 k points while the i7-11700F gets 512.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11700F is 5.3 times faster than the i5-7200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7200U gets a score of 97.5 k points while the i7-11700F gets 512.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11700F is 5.3 times faster than the i5-7200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
a0671
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Rocket Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.1 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
16384 kB
Date
August 2016
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
44.94k points
89.58k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.52k points
512.32k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7200U
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
19.34k
32.55k (x1.68)
Test#2 (FP)
17.47k
26.95k (x1.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.08k
10.76k (x2.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.04k
19.32k (x4.78)
TOTAL
44.94k
89.58k (x1.99)
Multithread
i5-7200U
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
42.86k
232.06k (x5.41)
Test#2 (FP)
41.3k
203.56k (x4.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.69k
72.89k (x7.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.68k
3.81k (x1.04)
TOTAL
97.52k
512.32k (x5.25)
Performance/W
i5-7200U
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
2857 points/W
3570 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2753 points/W
3132 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
646 points/W
1121 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
245 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
6501 points/W
7882 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-7200U
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
6239 points/GHz
6642 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5637 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1316 points/GHz
2196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1304 points/GHz
3943 points/GHz
TOTAL
14496 points/GHz
18281 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4