| | | | | | |

Core i5-6400 vs Xeon E5-2680 v2


Description
The i5-6400 is based on Skylake architecture while the E5-2680 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-6400 gets a score of 139.6 k points while the E5-2680 v2 gets 551.1 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2680 v2 is 3.9 times faster than the i5-6400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
306e4
Core
Skylake-S
Ivy Bridge-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
4/4
10 /20
TDP
65 W
115 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
25600 kB
Date
September 2015
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
48.05k points
28.23k points
Mean multithread perf.
174.05k points
551.1k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-6400
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
11.56k
11.96k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
16.53k
10.73k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.3k
4.59k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.97k
4.31k (x1.08)
TOTAL
36.36k
31.6k (x0.87)

Multithread

i5-6400

E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
43.01k
218.24k (x5.07)
Test#2 (FP)
64.46k
206.92k (x3.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.14k
100.37k (x6.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.91k
11.45k (x1.94)
TOTAL
129.51k
536.99k (x4.15)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-6400
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
11.82k
10.55k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
18.36k
10.02k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.43k
3.99k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.95k
3.66k (x0.74)
TOTAL
39.56k
28.23k (x0.71)

Multithread

i5-6400

E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
46.04k
215.04k (x4.67)
Test#2 (FP)
69.47k
230.43k (x3.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.33k
96.87k (x5.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.74k
8.76k (x1.13)
TOTAL
139.58k
551.1k (x3.95)

Performance/W
i5-6400
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
708 points/W
1870 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1069 points/W
2004 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
251 points/W
842 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
119 points/W
76 points/W
TOTAL
2147 points/W
4792 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-6400
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3583 points/GHz
2931 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5563 points/GHz
2784 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1341 points/GHz
1109 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1500 points/GHz
1017 points/GHz
TOTAL
11987 points/GHz
7841 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4