| | | | | | |

Core i5-6400 vs i5-12500H


Description
The i5-6400 is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-12500H is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-6400 gets a score of 174.1 k points while the i5-12500H gets 225.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12500H is 1.3 times faster than the i5-6400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
906a3
Core
Skylake-S
Alder Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
4/4
12/16
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x1280/2x2048 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
18432 kB
Date
September 2015
February 2022
Mean monothread perf.
48.05k points
58.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
174.05k points
225.65k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-6400
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
3.2k
6.93k (x2.17)
Test#2 (FP)
12.81k
18.76k (x1.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.18k
9.46k (x2.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.3k
8.17k (x1.9)
TOTAL
24.49k
43.33k (x1.77)

Multithread

i5-6400

i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
11.45k
18.04k (x1.58)
Test#2 (FP)
46.67k
66.78k (x1.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.69k
37.55k (x2.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.92k
6.08k (x1.03)
TOTAL
78.73k
128.45k (x1.63)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-6400
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
11.56k
21.93k (x1.9)
Test#2 (FP)
16.53k
18.79k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.3k
10.5k (x2.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.97k
8.11k (x2.04)
TOTAL
36.36k
59.33k (x1.63)

Multithread

i5-6400

i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
43.01k
61.07k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
64.46k
86.08k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.14k
41.08k (x2.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.91k
6.02k (x1.02)
TOTAL
129.51k
194.25k (x1.5)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-6400
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
11.82k
21.11k (x1.79)
Test#2 (FP)
18.36k
19.61k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.43k
9.53k (x2.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.95k
7.72k (x1.56)
TOTAL
39.56k
57.97k (x1.47)

Multithread

i5-6400

i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
46.04k
61.44k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
69.47k
93.66k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.33k
40.09k (x2.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.74k
6.01k (x0.78)
TOTAL
139.58k
201.2k (x1.44)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-6400
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
21.1k
22.61k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
18.28k
17.73k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.22k
9.63k (x2.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.45k
8.4k (x1.89)
TOTAL
48.05k
58.37k (x1.21)

Multithread

i5-6400

i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
80.03k
85.49k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
71.1k
94.93k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.19k
39.15k (x2.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
6.08k (x0.9)
TOTAL
174.05k
225.65k (x1.3)

Performance/W
i5-6400
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
1231 points/W
1900 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1094 points/W
2110 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
249 points/W
870 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
104 points/W
135 points/W
TOTAL
2678 points/W
5014 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-6400
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
6394 points/GHz
5025 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5539 points/GHz
3939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1279 points/GHz
2139 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1348 points/GHz
1867 points/GHz
TOTAL
14560 points/GHz
12971 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4