Core i5-6300HQ vs i5-10200H
Description
The i5-6300HQ is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-10200H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-6300HQ gets a score of 135.1 k points while the i5-10200H gets 260.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10200H is 1.9 times faster than the i5-6300HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-6300HQ gets a score of 135.1 k points while the i5-10200H gets 260.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10200H is 1.9 times faster than the i5-6300HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
a0652
Core
Skylake-H
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
45 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2015
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
40.99k points
67.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
135.14k points
260.38k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-6300HQ
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
17.99k
26.37k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
15.61k
23.91k (x1.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.56k
5.57k (x1.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
11.68k (x3.05)
TOTAL
40.99k
67.53k (x1.65)
Multithread
i5-6300HQ
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
64.95k
114.08k (x1.76)
Test#2 (FP)
54.01k
114.71k (x2.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.9k
27.33k (x2.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.29k
4.25k (x0.99)
TOTAL
135.14k
260.38k (x1.93)
Performance/W
i5-6300HQ
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
1443 points/W
3259 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1200 points/W
3277 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
264 points/W
781 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
95 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
3003 points/W
7439 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-6300HQ
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
5622 points/GHz
6433 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4878 points/GHz
5831 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1113 points/GHz
1358 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1196 points/GHz
2848 points/GHz
TOTAL
12808 points/GHz
16470 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4