| | | | | | |

Core i5-6300HQ vs Ryzen 3 5300U


Description
The i5-6300HQ is based on Skylake architecture while the 5300U is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-6300HQ gets a score of 135.1 k points while the 5300U gets 198.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 5300U is 1.5 times faster than the i5-6300HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
860f81
Core
Skylake-H
Lucienne
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2015
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
40.99k points
52.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
135.14k points
198.38k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-6300HQ
5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
17.99k
15.09k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
15.61k
23.74k (x1.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.56k
8.32k (x2.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
5.19k (x1.36)
TOTAL
40.99k
52.35k (x1.28)

Multithread

i5-6300HQ

5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
64.95k
67k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
54.01k
89.94k (x1.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.9k
36.84k (x3.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.29k
4.6k (x1.07)
TOTAL
135.14k
198.38k (x1.47)

Performance/W
i5-6300HQ
5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
1443 points/W
4467 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1200 points/W
5996 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
264 points/W
2456 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
95 points/W
307 points/W
TOTAL
3003 points/W
13226 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-6300HQ
5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
5622 points/GHz
3972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4878 points/GHz
6246 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1113 points/GHz
2190 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1196 points/GHz
1367 points/GHz
TOTAL
12808 points/GHz
13775 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4