| | | | | | |

Core i5-6300HQ vs A12 9800


Description
The i5-6300HQ is based on Skylake architecture while the 9800 is based on Excavator.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-6300HQ gets a score of 135.1 k points while the 9800 gets 100.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-6300HQ is 1.3 times faster than the 9800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
660f51
Core
Skylake-H
Bristol Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
Socket AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x96+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2X2048 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
kB
Date
September 2015
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
40.99k points
37.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
135.14k points
100.79k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-6300HQ
9800
Test#1 (Integers)
17.99k
13.42k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
15.61k
17.61k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.56k
3.77k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
3.06k (x0.8)
TOTAL
40.99k
37.86k (x0.92)

Multithread

i5-6300HQ

9800
Test#1 (Integers)
64.95k
40.46k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
54.01k
43.18k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.9k
12.78k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.29k
4.37k (x1.02)
TOTAL
135.14k
100.79k (x0.75)

Performance/W
i5-6300HQ
9800
Test#1 (Integers)
1443 points/W
622 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1200 points/W
664 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
264 points/W
197 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
95 points/W
67 points/W
TOTAL
3003 points/W
1551 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-6300HQ
9800
Test#1 (Integers)
5622 points/GHz
3195 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4878 points/GHz
4193 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1113 points/GHz
897 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1196 points/GHz
728 points/GHz
TOTAL
12808 points/GHz
9013 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4