| | | | | | |

Core i5-5675R vs Xeon E5-2667 v3


Description
The i5-5675R is based on Broadwell architecture while the E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5675R gets a score of 194.2 k points while the E5-2667 v3 gets 343.6 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 1.8 times faster than the i5-5675R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
40671
306f2
Core
Bradwell-H
Haswell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1364
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
65 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
20480 kB
Date
June 2015
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
51.43k points
41.36k points
Mean multithread perf.
194.2k points
343.64k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-5675R
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
12.88k
13.1k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
18.27k
11.91k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
4.83k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.45k
3.83k (x0.7)
TOTAL
41.72k
33.68k (x0.81)

Multithread

i5-5675R

E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
49.91k
105.42k (x2.11)
Test#2 (FP)
70.3k
109.99k (x1.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.69k
44.56k (x2.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.92k
17.7k (x1.05)
TOTAL
156.83k
277.66k (x1.77)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-5675R
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
21.91k
20.99k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
18.59k
11.9k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.2k
4.72k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.72k
3.75k (x0.66)
TOTAL
51.43k
41.36k (x0.8)

Multithread

i5-5675R

E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
84.92k
172.62k (x2.03)
Test#2 (FP)
72.09k
110.03k (x1.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.13k
44.06k (x2.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.07k
16.93k (x0.99)
TOTAL
194.2k
343.64k (x1.77)

Performance/W
i5-5675R
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
1306 points/W
1279 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1109 points/W
815 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
310 points/W
326 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
263 points/W
125 points/W
TOTAL
2988 points/W
2545 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-5675R
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
6087 points/GHz
5830 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5164 points/GHz
3305 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1445 points/GHz
1311 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1590 points/GHz
1043 points/GHz
TOTAL
14286 points/GHz
11489 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4