| | | | | | |

Core i5-5675R vs i9-10900K


Description
The i5-5675R is based on Broadwell architecture while the i9-10900K is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5675R gets a score of 194.2 k points while the i9-10900K gets 685.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10900K is 3.5 times faster than the i5-5675R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
40671
a0655
Core
Bradwell-H
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
BGA1364
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/4
10/20
TDP
65 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
20480 kB
Date
June 2015
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
51.43k points
80.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
194.2k points
685.65k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-5675R
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
12.86k
19.5k (x1.52)
Test#2 (FP)
16.85k
28.01k (x1.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.19k
7.45k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.49k
15.82k (x2.88)
TOTAL
40.39k
70.79k (x1.75)

Multithread

i5-5675R

i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
50.07k
194.49k (x3.88)
Test#2 (FP)
64.61k
312.59k (x4.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.84k
89.14k (x4.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.09k
12.58k (x0.74)
TOTAL
151.6k
608.81k (x4.02)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-5675R
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
21.91k
32.67k (x1.49)
Test#2 (FP)
18.59k
28.49k (x1.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.2k
6.53k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.72k
12.72k (x2.22)
TOTAL
51.43k
80.41k (x1.56)

Multithread

i5-5675R

i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
84.92k
307.39k (x3.62)
Test#2 (FP)
72.09k
298.47k (x4.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.13k
72.94k (x3.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.07k
6.85k (x0.4)
TOTAL
194.2k
685.65k (x3.53)

Performance/W
i5-5675R
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
1306 points/W
2459 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1109 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
310 points/W
583 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
263 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
2988 points/W
5485 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-5675R
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
6087 points/GHz
6282 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5164 points/GHz
5479 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1445 points/GHz
1257 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1590 points/GHz
2445 points/GHz
TOTAL
14286 points/GHz
15463 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4