| | | | | | |

Core i5-5675R vs i5-1035G4


Description
The i5-5675R is based on Broadwell architecture while the i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5675R gets a score of 194.2 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 142.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-5675R is 1.4 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
40671
706e5
Core
Bradwell-H
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA1364
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
June 2015
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
51.43k points
65.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
194.2k points
142.69k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-5675R
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
4.14k
4.05k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
14.35k
15.29k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.94k
9.04k (x1.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.47k
10.54k (x1.93)
TOTAL
28.91k
38.92k (x1.35)

Multithread

i5-5675R

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
16.02k
9.05k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
54.6k
33.88k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.69k
15.34k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.87k
6.74k (x0.4)
TOTAL
106.18k
65.01k (x0.61)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-5675R
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
12.86k
7.07k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
16.85k
10.55k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.19k
5.27k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.49k
5.66k (x1.03)
TOTAL
40.39k
28.56k (x0.71)

Multithread

i5-5675R

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
50.07k
25.28k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
64.61k
37.48k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.84k
17.77k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.09k
6.92k (x0.4)
TOTAL
151.6k
87.45k (x0.58)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-5675R
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
12.88k
13.9k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
18.27k
20.13k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
9.41k (x1.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.45k
10.59k (x1.94)
TOTAL
41.72k
54.03k (x1.29)

Multithread

i5-5675R

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
49.91k
55.4k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
70.3k
59.01k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.69k
22.83k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.92k
6.7k (x0.4)
TOTAL
156.83k
143.94k (x0.92)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-5675R
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
21.91k
25.53k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
18.59k
19.99k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.2k
9.31k (x1.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.72k
10.81k (x1.89)
TOTAL
51.43k
65.64k (x1.28)

Multithread

i5-5675R

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
84.92k
58.46k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
72.09k
57.31k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.13k
20.1k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.07k
6.81k (x0.4)
TOTAL
194.2k
142.69k (x0.73)

Performance/W
i5-5675R
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
1306 points/W
3897 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1109 points/W
3821 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
310 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
263 points/W
454 points/W
TOTAL
2988 points/W
9513 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-5675R
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
6087 points/GHz
6901 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5164 points/GHz
5401 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1445 points/GHz
2515 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1590 points/GHz
2922 points/GHz
TOTAL
14286 points/GHz
17739 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4