Core i5-5675R vs Ryzen 9 3900
Description
The i5-5675R is based on Broadwell architecture while the 3900 is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5675R gets a score of 194.2 k points while the 3900 gets 687.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 3.5 times faster than the i5-5675R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5675R gets a score of 194.2 k points while the 3900 gets 687.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 3.5 times faster than the i5-5675R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40671
870f10
Core
Bradwell-H
Matisse
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1364
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
12/24
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4x16384 kB
Date
June 2015
September 2019
Mean monothread perf.
51.43k points
74.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
194.2k points
687.5k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-5675R
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
4.14k
4.39k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
14.35k
16.99k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.94k
7.74k (x1.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.47k
24.57k (x4.49)
TOTAL
28.91k
53.69k (x1.86)
Multithread
i5-5675R
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
16.02k
48.45k (x3.02)
Test#2 (FP)
54.6k
230.81k (x4.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.69k
122.82k (x6.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.87k
54.73k (x3.24)
TOTAL
106.18k
456.8k (x4.3)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-5675R
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
12.86k
16.59k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
16.85k
24.55k (x1.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.19k
8.55k (x1.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.49k
26.28k (x4.78)
TOTAL
40.39k
75.97k (x1.88)
Multithread
i5-5675R
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
50.07k
181.33k (x3.62)
Test#2 (FP)
64.61k
261.01k (x4.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.84k
126.62k (x6.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.09k
66.64k (x3.9)
TOTAL
151.6k
635.6k (x4.19)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-5675R
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
12.88k
16.16k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
18.27k
23.75k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
9.32k (x1.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.45k
23.17k (x4.25)
TOTAL
41.72k
72.4k (x1.74)
Multithread
i5-5675R
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
49.91k
174.73k (x3.5)
Test#2 (FP)
70.3k
275.63k (x3.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.69k
125.65k (x6.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.92k
44.17k (x2.61)
TOTAL
156.83k
620.18k (x3.95)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-5675R
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
21.91k
16.85k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
18.59k
26.03k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.2k
9.54k (x1.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.72k
22.55k (x3.94)
TOTAL
51.43k
74.97k (x1.46)
Multithread
i5-5675R
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
84.92k
229.41k (x2.7)
Test#2 (FP)
72.09k
292.81k (x4.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.13k
128.48k (x6.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.07k
36.8k (x2.16)
TOTAL
194.2k
687.5k (x3.54)
Performance/W
i5-5675R
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
1306 points/W
3529 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1109 points/W
4505 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
310 points/W
1977 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
263 points/W
566 points/W
TOTAL
2988 points/W
10577 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-5675R
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
6087 points/GHz
3920 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5164 points/GHz
6054 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1445 points/GHz
2218 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1590 points/GHz
5243 points/GHz
TOTAL
14286 points/GHz
17435 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4