Core i5-5675R vs Ryzen 3 2200U
Description
The i5-5675R is based on Broadwell architecture while the 2200U is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5675R gets a score of 194.2 k points while the 2200U gets 71 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-5675R is 2.7 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5675R gets a score of 194.2 k points while the 2200U gets 71 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-5675R is 2.7 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40671
810f10
Core
Bradwell-H
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1364
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
June 2015
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
51.43k points
36.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
194.2k points
71.02k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-5675R
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.14k
2.63k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
14.35k
7.84k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.94k
3.63k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.47k
2.93k (x0.53)
TOTAL
28.91k
17.02k (x0.59)
Multithread
i5-5675R
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.02k
5.77k (x0.36)
Test#2 (FP)
54.6k
24.15k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.69k
9.28k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.87k
2.83k (x0.17)
TOTAL
106.18k
42.02k (x0.4)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-5675R
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.86k
11.67k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
16.85k
14.02k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.19k
4.53k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.49k
2.93k (x0.53)
TOTAL
40.39k
33.14k (x0.82)
Multithread
i5-5675R
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
50.07k
20.49k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
64.61k
31.32k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.84k
9.99k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.09k
3.03k (x0.18)
TOTAL
151.6k
64.82k (x0.43)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-5675R
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.88k
11.54k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
18.27k
19.69k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
4.55k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.45k
3.25k (x0.6)
TOTAL
41.72k
39.03k (x0.94)
Multithread
i5-5675R
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
49.91k
19.25k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
70.3k
36.27k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.69k
10.2k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.92k
3.07k (x0.18)
TOTAL
156.83k
68.8k (x0.44)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-5675R
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
21.91k
10.73k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
18.59k
18.15k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.2k
3.99k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.72k
3.89k (x0.68)
TOTAL
51.43k
36.77k (x0.71)
Multithread
i5-5675R
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
84.92k
20.11k (x0.24)
Test#2 (FP)
72.09k
36.87k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.13k
10.74k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.07k
3.31k (x0.19)
TOTAL
194.2k
71.02k (x0.37)
Performance/W
i5-5675R
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1306 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1109 points/W
2458 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
310 points/W
716 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
263 points/W
220 points/W
TOTAL
2988 points/W
4735 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-5675R
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
6087 points/GHz
3157 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5164 points/GHz
5338 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1445 points/GHz
1175 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1590 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
TOTAL
14286 points/GHz
10814 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4