| | | | | | |

Core i5-5300U vs i5-10500T


Description
The i5-5300U is based on Broadwell architecture while the i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5300U gets a score of 76.7 k points while the i5-10500T gets 302.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 3.9 times faster than the i5-5300U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306d4
a0653
Core
Broadwell-U
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1168
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2 /4
6/12
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2015
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
38.29k points
64.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
76.71k points
302.13k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-5300U
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
17.2k
25.16k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
14.53k
22.28k (x1.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.44k
5.18k (x1.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.12k
11.97k (x3.84)
TOTAL
38.29k
64.6k (x1.69)

Multithread

i5-5300U

i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
28.7k
144.86k (x5.05)
Test#2 (FP)
35.19k
120.98k (x3.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.24k
32.55k (x3.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.57k
3.73k (x1.05)
TOTAL
76.71k
302.13k (x3.94)

Performance/W
i5-5300U
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
1914 points/W
4139 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2346 points/W
3457 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
616 points/W
930 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
238 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
5114 points/W
8632 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-5300U
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
5931 points/GHz
6621 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5011 points/GHz
5863 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1186 points/GHz
1364 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1076 points/GHz
3151 points/GHz
TOTAL
13204 points/GHz
16999 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4