| | | | | | |

Core i5-5300U vs A9 9425


Description
The i5-5300U is based on Broadwell architecture while the 9425 is based on Excavator.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5300U gets a score of 76.7 k points while the 9425 gets 41.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-5300U is 1.8 times faster than the 9425. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306d4
670f00
Core
Broadwell-U
Stoney Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1168
BGA-FP4
Cores/Threads
2 /4
2/2
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
March 2015
May 2018
Mean monothread perf.
38.29k points
31.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
76.71k points
41.73k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-5300U
9425
Test#1 (Integers)
17.2k
11.23k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
14.53k
14.7k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.44k
3.15k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.12k
2.24k (x0.72)
TOTAL
38.29k
31.31k (x0.82)

Multithread

i5-5300U

9425
Test#1 (Integers)
28.7k
16.58k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
35.19k
17.84k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.24k
5.09k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.57k
2.23k (x0.62)
TOTAL
76.71k
41.73k (x0.54)

Performance/W
i5-5300U
9425
Test#1 (Integers)
1914 points/W
1105 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2346 points/W
1189 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
616 points/W
339 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
238 points/W
148 points/W
TOTAL
5114 points/W
2782 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-5300U
9425
Test#1 (Integers)
5931 points/GHz
3034 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5011 points/GHz
3972 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1186 points/GHz
850 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1076 points/GHz
605 points/GHz
TOTAL
13204 points/GHz
8461 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4