Core i5-5200U vs Xeon E5-2680 v4
Description
Both models i5-5200U and E5-2680 v4 are based on Broadwell architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5200U gets a score of 68.7 k points while the E5-2680 v4 gets 1162.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 16.9 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5200U gets a score of 68.7 k points while the E5-2680 v4 gets 1162.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 16.9 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306d4
406f1
Core
Broadwell-U
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2 /4
14/28
TDP
15 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
14x32+14x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
14x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
35840 kB
Date
March 2015
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
31.81k points
41.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
68.69k points
1162.63k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-5200U
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
13.58k
17.8k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
12.14k
16.51k (x1.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.18k
4.47k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.92k
2.56k (x0.88)
TOTAL
31.81k
41.35k (x1.3)
Multithread
i5-5200U
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
28.89k
494.82k (x17.13)
Test#2 (FP)
28.74k
514.13k (x17.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.31k
132.87k (x18.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.74k
20.8k (x5.56)
TOTAL
68.69k
1162.63k (x16.93)
Performance/W
i5-5200U
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
1926 points/W
4124 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1916 points/W
4284 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
488 points/W
1107 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
249 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
4579 points/W
9689 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-5200U
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
5029 points/GHz
5393 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4497 points/GHz
5004 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1176 points/GHz
1355 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1080 points/GHz
777 points/GHz
TOTAL
11782 points/GHz
12529 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4