| | | | | | |

Core i5-5200U vs Xeon E5-2667 v3


Description
The i5-5200U is based on Broadwell architecture while the E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5200U gets a score of 68.7 k points while the E5-2667 v3 gets 343.6 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 5 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306d4
306f2
Core
Broadwell-U
Haswell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2 /4
8/16
TDP
15 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
20480 kB
Date
March 2015
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
31.81k points
41.36k points
Mean multithread perf.
68.69k points
343.64k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-5200U
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
8.48k
13.1k (x1.54)
Test#2 (FP)
12.03k
11.91k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.32k
4.83k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.79k
3.83k (x1.37)
TOTAL
26.62k
33.68k (x1.26)

Multithread

i5-5200U

E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
15.19k
105.42k (x6.94)
Test#2 (FP)
25.99k
109.99k (x4.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.71k
44.56k (x6.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.96k
17.7k (x5.98)
TOTAL
50.85k
277.66k (x5.46)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-5200U
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
13.58k
20.99k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
12.14k
11.9k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.18k
4.72k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.92k
3.75k (x1.29)
TOTAL
31.81k
41.36k (x1.3)

Multithread

i5-5200U

E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
28.89k
172.62k (x5.98)
Test#2 (FP)
28.74k
110.03k (x3.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.31k
44.06k (x6.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.74k
16.93k (x4.52)
TOTAL
68.69k
343.64k (x5)

Performance/W
i5-5200U
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
1926 points/W
1279 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1916 points/W
815 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
488 points/W
326 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
249 points/W
125 points/W
TOTAL
4579 points/W
2545 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-5200U
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
5029 points/GHz
5830 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4497 points/GHz
3305 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1176 points/GHz
1311 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1080 points/GHz
1043 points/GHz
TOTAL
11782 points/GHz
11489 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4