Core i5-5200U vs Xeon E5-1660 v4
Description
Both models i5-5200U and E5-1660 v4 are based on Broadwell architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5200U gets a score of 50.9 k points while the E5-1660 v4 gets 320.5 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-1660 v4 is 6.3 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5200U gets a score of 50.9 k points while the E5-1660 v4 gets 320.5 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-1660 v4 is 6.3 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306d4
406f1
Core
Broadwell-U
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2 /4
8/16
TDP
15 W
140 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
20480 kB
Date
March 2015
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
31.81k points
37.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
68.69k points
320.49k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-5200U
E5-1660 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
8.48k
12.41k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
12.03k
17.23k (x1.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.32k
4.89k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.79k
3.07k (x1.1)
TOTAL
26.62k
37.6k (x1.41)
Multithread
i5-5200U
E5-1660 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
15.19k
102.11k (x6.72)
Test#2 (FP)
25.99k
156.5k (x6.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.71k
42.08k (x6.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.96k
19.8k (x6.69)
TOTAL
50.85k
320.49k (x6.3)
Performance/W
i5-5200U
E5-1660 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
1013 points/W
729 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1733 points/W
1118 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
447 points/W
301 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
197 points/W
141 points/W
TOTAL
3390 points/W
2289 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-5200U
E5-1660 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
3140 points/GHz
3266 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4455 points/GHz
4534 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1231 points/GHz
1286 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1035 points/GHz
809 points/GHz
TOTAL
9860 points/GHz
9895 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4