Core i5-5200U vs Xeon E5-1660 v3
Description
The i5-5200U is based on Broadwell architecture while the E5-1660 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5200U gets a score of 68.7 k points while the E5-1660 v3 gets 353 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-1660 v3 is 5.1 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5200U gets a score of 68.7 k points while the E5-1660 v3 gets 353 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-1660 v3 is 5.1 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306d4
306f2
Core
Broadwell-U
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2 /4
8/16
TDP
15 W
140 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
20480 kB
Date
March 2015
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
31.81k points
41.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
68.69k points
352.96k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-5200U
E5-1660 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
13.58k
20.92k (x1.54)
Test#2 (FP)
12.14k
11.87k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.18k
4.67k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.92k
3.85k (x1.32)
TOTAL
31.81k
41.31k (x1.3)
Multithread
i5-5200U
E5-1660 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
28.89k
174.59k (x6.04)
Test#2 (FP)
28.74k
116.47k (x4.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.31k
44.79k (x6.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.74k
17.1k (x4.57)
TOTAL
68.69k
352.96k (x5.14)
Performance/W
i5-5200U
E5-1660 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
1926 points/W
1247 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1916 points/W
832 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
488 points/W
320 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
249 points/W
122 points/W
TOTAL
4579 points/W
2521 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-5200U
E5-1660 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
5029 points/GHz
5977 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4497 points/GHz
3391 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1176 points/GHz
1333 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1080 points/GHz
1101 points/GHz
TOTAL
11782 points/GHz
11802 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4