Core i5-5200U vs Xeon E5-1620 v2
Description
The i5-5200U is based on Broadwell architecture while the E5-1620 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5200U gets a score of 50.9 k points while the E5-1620 v2 gets 144.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-1620 v2 is 2.8 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5200U gets a score of 50.9 k points while the E5-1620 v2 gets 144.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-1620 v2 is 2.8 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306d4
306e4
Core
Broadwell-U
Ivy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
2 /4
4 /8
TDP
15 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
10240 kB
Date
March 2015
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
31.81k points
34.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
68.69k points
144.57k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-5200U
E5-1620 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
8.48k
12.55k (x1.48)
Test#2 (FP)
12.03k
12.14k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.32k
4.83k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.79k
4.85k (x1.74)
TOTAL
26.62k
34.37k (x1.29)
Multithread
i5-5200U
E5-1620 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
15.19k
51.93k (x3.42)
Test#2 (FP)
25.99k
56.7k (x2.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.71k
23.81k (x3.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.96k
12.14k (x4.1)
TOTAL
50.85k
144.57k (x2.84)
Performance/W
i5-5200U
E5-1620 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
1013 points/W
399 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1733 points/W
436 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
447 points/W
183 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
197 points/W
93 points/W
TOTAL
3390 points/W
1112 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-5200U
E5-1620 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3140 points/GHz
3217 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4455 points/GHz
3113 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1231 points/GHz
1238 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1035 points/GHz
1244 points/GHz
TOTAL
9860 points/GHz
8812 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4