Core i5-5200U vs i5-2500K
Description
The i5-5200U is based on Broadwell architecture while the i5-2500K is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5200U gets a score of 50.9 k points while the i5-2500K gets 111.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-2500K is 2.2 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5200U gets a score of 50.9 k points while the i5-2500K gets 111.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-2500K is 2.2 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306d4
206a7
Core
Broadwell-U
Sandy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2 /4
4/4
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2015
January 2011
Mean monothread perf.
31.81k points
32.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
68.69k points
111.83k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-5200U
i5-2500K
Test#1 (Integers)
8.48k
11.84k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
12.03k
10.43k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.32k
5.22k (x1.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.79k
5.36k (x1.92)
TOTAL
26.62k
32.85k (x1.23)
Multithread
i5-5200U
i5-2500K
Test#1 (Integers)
15.19k
45.51k (x3)
Test#2 (FP)
25.99k
40.83k (x1.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.71k
20.7k (x3.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.96k
4.79k (x1.62)
TOTAL
50.85k
111.83k (x2.2)
Performance/W
i5-5200U
i5-2500K
Test#1 (Integers)
1013 points/W
479 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1733 points/W
430 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
447 points/W
218 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
197 points/W
50 points/W
TOTAL
3390 points/W
1177 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-5200U
i5-2500K
Test#1 (Integers)
3140 points/GHz
3200 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4455 points/GHz
2818 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1231 points/GHz
1411 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1035 points/GHz
1449 points/GHz
TOTAL
9860 points/GHz
8878 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4