| | | | | | |

Core i5-5200U vs Ryzen 7 3750H


Description
The i5-5200U is based on Broadwell architecture while the 3750H is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5200U gets a score of 68.7 k points while the 3750H gets 175.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 3750H is 2.6 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306d4
810f81
Core
Broadwell-U
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
2 /4
4/8
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2015
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
31.81k points
46.91k points
Mean multithread perf.
68.69k points
175.18k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-5200U
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
2.67k
3.78k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
9.37k
16.42k (x1.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.13k
4.75k (x1.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.59k
5.51k (x2.12)
TOTAL
17.76k
30.46k (x1.72)

Multithread

i5-5200U

3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
4.16k
15.18k (x3.65)
Test#2 (FP)
19.01k
74.87k (x3.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.48k
27.85k (x4.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.96k
6.08k (x2.05)
TOTAL
32.61k
123.97k (x3.8)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-5200U
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.58k
13.72k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
12.14k
22.93k (x1.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.18k
4.99k (x1.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.92k
5.27k (x1.81)
TOTAL
31.81k
46.91k (x1.47)

Multithread

i5-5200U

3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
28.89k
50.54k (x1.75)
Test#2 (FP)
28.74k
93.33k (x3.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.31k
25.25k (x3.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.74k
6.07k (x1.62)
TOTAL
68.69k
175.18k (x2.55)

Performance/W
i5-5200U
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
1926 points/W
1444 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1916 points/W
2667 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
488 points/W
721 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
249 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
4579 points/W
5005 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-5200U
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
5029 points/GHz
3430 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4497 points/GHz
5733 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1176 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1080 points/GHz
1317 points/GHz
TOTAL
11782 points/GHz
11726 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4