Core i5-5200U vs Ryzen 7 3700X
Description
The i5-5200U is based on Broadwell architecture while the 3700X is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5200U gets a score of 68.7 k points while the 3700X gets 483.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3700X is 7 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5200U gets a score of 68.7 k points while the 3700X gets 483.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3700X is 7 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306d4
870f10
Core
Broadwell-U
Matisse
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
Cores/Threads
2 /4
8/16
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
32768 kB
Date
March 2015
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
31.81k points
74.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
68.69k points
483.47k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-5200U
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
13.58k
16.77k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
12.14k
26.29k (x2.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.18k
8.79k (x2.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.92k
22.51k (x7.72)
TOTAL
31.81k
74.35k (x2.34)
Multithread
i5-5200U
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
28.89k
167.94k (x5.81)
Test#2 (FP)
28.74k
209.85k (x7.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.31k
94.41k (x12.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.74k
11.27k (x3.01)
TOTAL
68.69k
483.47k (x7.04)
Performance/W
i5-5200U
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
1926 points/W
2584 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1916 points/W
3228 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
488 points/W
1452 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
249 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
4579 points/W
7438 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-5200U
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
5029 points/GHz
3811 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4497 points/GHz
5976 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1176 points/GHz
1997 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1080 points/GHz
5115 points/GHz
TOTAL
11782 points/GHz
16898 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4