Core i5-5200U vs Ryzen 5 5600H
Description
The i5-5200U is based on Broadwell architecture while the 5600H is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5200U gets a score of 68.7 k points while the 5600H gets 255.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600H is 3.7 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5200U gets a score of 68.7 k points while the 5600H gets 255.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600H is 3.7 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306d4
a50f00
Core
Broadwell-U
Cezanne
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
2 /4
6/12
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
16384 kB
Date
March 2015
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
31.81k points
53.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
68.69k points
255.19k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-5200U
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.58k
14.34k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
12.14k
17.67k (x1.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.18k
6.41k (x2.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.92k
14.95k (x5.13)
TOTAL
31.81k
53.37k (x1.68)
Multithread
i5-5200U
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
28.89k
83.58k (x2.89)
Test#2 (FP)
28.74k
119.22k (x4.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.31k
48.56k (x6.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.74k
3.83k (x1.02)
TOTAL
68.69k
255.19k (x3.72)
Performance/W
i5-5200U
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
1926 points/W
1857 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1916 points/W
2649 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
488 points/W
1079 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
249 points/W
85 points/W
TOTAL
4579 points/W
5671 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-5200U
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
5029 points/GHz
3413 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4497 points/GHz
4207 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1176 points/GHz
1527 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1080 points/GHz
3560 points/GHz
TOTAL
11782 points/GHz
12707 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4