| | | | | | |

Core i5-5200U vs Ryzen 5 2600


Description
The i5-5200U is based on Broadwell architecture while the 2600 is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5200U gets a score of 68.7 k points while the 2600 gets 291.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 2600 is 4.2 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306d4
800f82
Core
Broadwell-U
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
Cores/Threads
2 /4
6/12
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
March 2015
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
31.81k points
57.13k points
Mean multithread perf.
68.69k points
291.53k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-5200U
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
2.67k
3.41k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
9.37k
15.96k (x1.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.13k
4.69k (x1.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.59k
17.42k (x6.71)
TOTAL
17.76k
41.47k (x2.33)

Multithread

i5-5200U

2600
Test#1 (Integers)
4.16k
20.88k (x5.02)
Test#2 (FP)
19.01k
110.37k (x5.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.48k
39.25k (x6.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.96k
6.66k (x2.25)
TOTAL
32.61k
177.16k (x5.43)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-5200U
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
13.58k
13.76k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
12.14k
23.03k (x1.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.18k
5.12k (x1.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.92k
15.23k (x5.22)
TOTAL
31.81k
57.13k (x1.8)

Multithread

i5-5200U

2600
Test#1 (Integers)
28.89k
83.23k (x2.88)
Test#2 (FP)
28.74k
161.06k (x5.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.31k
40.52k (x5.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.74k
6.73k (x1.8)
TOTAL
68.69k
291.53k (x4.24)

Performance/W
i5-5200U
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
1926 points/W
1281 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1916 points/W
2478 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
488 points/W
623 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
249 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
4579 points/W
4485 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-5200U
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
5029 points/GHz
3529 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4497 points/GHz
5904 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1176 points/GHz
1313 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1080 points/GHz
3904 points/GHz
TOTAL
11782 points/GHz
14650 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4