Core i5-5200U vs Ryzen 5 1600
Description
The i5-5200U is based on Broadwell architecture while the 1600 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5200U gets a score of 68.7 k points while the 1600 gets 272.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600 is 4 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5200U gets a score of 68.7 k points while the 1600 gets 272.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600 is 4 times faster than the i5-5200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306d4
800f11
Core
Broadwell-U
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
Cores/Threads
2 /4
6/12
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
March 2015
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
31.81k points
56.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
68.69k points
272.8k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-5200U
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
13.58k
13.67k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
12.14k
22.28k (x1.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.18k
4.99k (x1.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.92k
15.22k (x5.22)
TOTAL
31.81k
56.16k (x1.77)
Multithread
i5-5200U
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
28.89k
81.03k (x2.8)
Test#2 (FP)
28.74k
145.84k (x5.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.31k
39.14k (x5.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.74k
6.79k (x1.81)
TOTAL
68.69k
272.8k (x3.97)
Performance/W
i5-5200U
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
1926 points/W
1247 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1916 points/W
2244 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
488 points/W
602 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
249 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
4579 points/W
4197 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-5200U
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
5029 points/GHz
3797 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4497 points/GHz
6189 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1176 points/GHz
1387 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1080 points/GHz
4228 points/GHz
TOTAL
11782 points/GHz
15601 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4