Core i5-5200U vs Athlon X4 760K
Description
The i5-5200U is based on Broadwell architecture while the 760K is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5200U gets a score of 50.9 k points while the 760K gets 49.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-5200U is 1 times faster than the 760K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-5200U gets a score of 50.9 k points while the 760K gets 49.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-5200U is 1 times faster than the 760K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306d4
610f31
Core
Broadwell-U
Richland
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
Socket FM2
Cores/Threads
2 /4
4/4
TDP
15 W
100 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x16+2x64 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x2048 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
kB
Date
March 2015
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
31.81k points
24.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
68.69k points
49.8k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-5200U
760K
Test#1 (Integers)
8.48k
9.53k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
12.03k
8.14k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.32k
3.45k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.79k
3.48k (x1.25)
TOTAL
26.62k
24.6k (x0.92)
Multithread
i5-5200U
760K
Test#1 (Integers)
15.19k
18.2k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
25.99k
19.33k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.71k
8.42k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.96k
3.86k (x1.3)
TOTAL
50.85k
49.8k (x0.98)
Performance/W
i5-5200U
760K
Test#1 (Integers)
1013 points/W
182 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1733 points/W
193 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
447 points/W
84 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
197 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
3390 points/W
498 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-5200U
760K
Test#1 (Integers)
3140 points/GHz
2324 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4455 points/GHz
1986 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1231 points/GHz
842 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1035 points/GHz
849 points/GHz
TOTAL
9860 points/GHz
6001 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4