| | | | | | |

Core i5-4690K vs i5-520M


Description
The i5-4690K is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-520M is based on Westmere.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4690K gets a score of 117 k points while the i5-520M gets 33.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-4690K is 3.5 times faster than the i5-520M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
20652
Core
Haswell
Arrandale
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
2.933 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
FC-PGA 988
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
88 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
3072 kB
Date
June 2014
January 2010
Mean monothread perf.
34.37k points
15.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
117.37k points
33.14k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-4690K
i5-520M
Test#1 (Integers)
13.67k
6.67k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
11.97k
4.59k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
2.49k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.4k
2.18k (x0.49)
TOTAL
35.17k
15.93k (x0.45)

Multithread

i5-4690K

i5-520M
Test#1 (Integers)
51.76k
13.75k (x0.27)
Test#2 (FP)
43.26k
10.03k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.32k
6.67k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.69k
2.68k (x1)
TOTAL
117.03k
33.14k (x0.28)

Performance/W
i5-4690K
i5-520M
Test#1 (Integers)
588 points/W
393 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
492 points/W
287 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
220 points/W
191 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
31 points/W
77 points/W
TOTAL
1330 points/W
947 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-4690K
i5-520M
Test#1 (Integers)
3506 points/GHz
2275 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3070 points/GHz
1567 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1314 points/GHz
849 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1129 points/GHz
742 points/GHz
TOTAL
9019 points/GHz
5433 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4