| | | | | | |

Core i5-4590S vs Xeon Silver 4110


Description
The i5-4590S is based on Haswell architecture while the 4110 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4590S gets a score of 78.4 k points while the 4110 gets 156.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 4110 is 2 times faster than the i5-4590S . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
50654
Core
Haswell
Skylake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
LGA3647
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
65 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
11264 kB
Date
May 2014
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
34.75k points
45.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
117.77k points
281.48k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-4590S
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
4.24k
3k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
10.54k
12.29k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
3.64k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.29k
6.55k (x1.53)
TOTAL
23.84k
25.46k (x1.07)

Multithread

i5-4590S

4110
Test#1 (Integers)
15.01k
20.42k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
37.75k
95.83k (x2.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.12k
30.88k (x1.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.48k
9.7k (x1.14)
TOTAL
78.37k
156.83k (x2)

Performance/W
i5-4590S
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
231 points/W
240 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
581 points/W
1127 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
263 points/W
363 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
130 points/W
114 points/W
TOTAL
1206 points/W
1845 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-4590S
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
1146 points/GHz
998 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2850 points/GHz
4095 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1287 points/GHz
1212 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1159 points/GHz
2182 points/GHz
TOTAL
6442 points/GHz
8487 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4