Core i5-4590S vs Ryzen 5 2600
Description
The i5-4590S is based on Haswell architecture while the 2600 is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4590S gets a score of 78.4 k points while the 2600 gets 177.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600 is 2.3 times faster than the i5-4590S . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4590S gets a score of 78.4 k points while the 2600 gets 177.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600 is 2.3 times faster than the i5-4590S . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
800f82
Core
Haswell
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
May 2014
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
34.75k points
57.13k points
Mean multithread perf.
117.77k points
291.53k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-4590S
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
4.24k
3.41k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
10.54k
15.96k (x1.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
4.69k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.29k
17.42k (x4.06)
TOTAL
23.84k
41.47k (x1.74)
Multithread
i5-4590S
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
15.01k
20.88k (x1.39)
Test#2 (FP)
37.75k
110.37k (x2.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.12k
39.25k (x2.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.48k
6.66k (x0.79)
TOTAL
78.37k
177.16k (x2.26)
Performance/W
i5-4590S
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
231 points/W
321 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
581 points/W
1698 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
263 points/W
604 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
130 points/W
102 points/W
TOTAL
1206 points/W
2726 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-4590S
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
1146 points/GHz
873 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2850 points/GHz
4092 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1287 points/GHz
1202 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1159 points/GHz
4466 points/GHz
TOTAL
6442 points/GHz
10633 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4