| | | | | | |

Core i5-4590 vs i3-6006U


Description
The i5-4590 is based on Haswell architecture while the i3-6006U is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4590 gets a score of 144.8 k points while the i3-6006U gets 67.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-4590 is 2.1 times faster than the i3-6006U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
406e3
Core
Haswell
Skylake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
84 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
3072 kB
Date
June 2014
November 2016
Mean monothread perf.
41.76k points
30.66k points
Mean multithread perf.
144.76k points
67.91k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4590
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
21.17k
12.6k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
11.52k
11.66k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.75k
2.71k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.32k
3.68k (x0.85)
TOTAL
41.76k
30.66k (x0.73)

Multithread

i5-4590

i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
77.73k
29.56k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
42.15k
27.74k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.41k
6.56k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.47k
4.06k (x0.54)
TOTAL
144.76k
67.91k (x0.47)

Performance/W
i5-4590
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
925 points/W
1971 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
502 points/W
1849 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
207 points/W
437 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
89 points/W
270 points/W
TOTAL
1723 points/W
4528 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-4590
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
5723 points/GHz
6302 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3112 points/GHz
5831 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1284 points/GHz
1355 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1168 points/GHz
1842 points/GHz
TOTAL
11287 points/GHz
15330 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4