| | | | | | |

Core i5-4570S vs i5-10210U


Description
The i5-4570S is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4570S gets a score of 138.5 k points while the i5-10210U gets 145.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10210U is 1.1 times faster than the i5-4570S . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
806ec
Core
Comet Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
June 2013
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
39.82k points
55.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
138.55k points
145.51k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4570S
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.16k
23.11k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
10.78k
20.58k (x1.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.47k
4.73k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.41k
7.43k (x1.68)
TOTAL
39.82k
55.86k (x1.4)

Multithread

i5-4570S

i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
74.28k
65.84k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
41.76k
60.77k (x1.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16k
14.45k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.51k
4.44k (x0.68)
TOTAL
138.55k
145.51k (x1.05)

Performance/W
i5-4570S
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
1143 points/W
4389 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
642 points/W
4052 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
246 points/W
964 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
100 points/W
296 points/W
TOTAL
2132 points/W
9701 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-4570S
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
5600 points/GHz
5503 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2995 points/GHz
4900 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1241 points/GHz
1127 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1226 points/GHz
1769 points/GHz
TOTAL
11061 points/GHz
13299 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4