| | | | | | |

Core i5-4570 vs i5-9400F


Description
The i5-4570 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-9400F is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-4570 gets a score of 161.6 k points while the i5-9400F gets 331.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9400F is 2 times faster than the i5-4570 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306c3
906ea
Core
Haswell
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/6
TDP
84 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
9216 kB
Date
September 2013
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
43.56k points
67.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
161.61k points
331.19k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-4570
i5-9400F
Test#1 (Integers)
21.72k
27.15k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
12.27k
23.63k (x1.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.03k
5.38k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.54k
11.61k (x2.56)
TOTAL
43.56k
67.77k (x1.56)

Multithread

i5-4570

i5-9400F
Test#1 (Integers)
85.75k
156.61k (x1.83)
Test#2 (FP)
48.71k
138k (x2.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.08k
29.45k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.07k
7.14k (x1.01)
TOTAL
161.61k
331.19k (x2.05)

Performance/W
i5-4570
i5-9400F
Test#1 (Integers)
1021 points/W
2409 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
580 points/W
2123 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
239 points/W
453 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
110 points/W
TOTAL
1924 points/W
5095 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-4570
i5-9400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6034 points/GHz
6622 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3408 points/GHz
5763 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1398 points/GHz
1312 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1261 points/GHz
2831 points/GHz
TOTAL
12101 points/GHz
16528 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4